Pixel 4a Review - Forgoing flagship features for a great, affordable phone - Android

Google finally designed a modern Pixel smartphone. The Pixel 3 XL came close with its nearly edge-to-edge display, but many decried the overly large notch. MobileSyrup’s Brad Bennett is a staunch defender of the notch, but on the whole, most don’t like it. The Pixel 4 and 4 XL also came close, but opted for a large top-bezel to make room for the Soli radar sensor and face unlock tech.

The Pixel 4a doesn’t have either of those things, which gave Google the liberty of trying something new — well, new for Google. It included a hole-punch camera cutout in the display like Samsung’s Galaxy S10e, although the Pixel 4a put it in the top left corner instead of the right.

Starting top and going clockwise: Samsung Galaxy S10e, Pixel 4a, Pixel 4

I’m a fan of the design, and I think the Pixel 4a looks stellar. Further adding to the excellence of the 4a is the phone’s overall look and feel. Google opted for a polycarbonate back with a soft-touch material similar to what’s found on the Pixel 3 series and the white and orange Pixel 4. It feels great in hand, doesn’t smudge like glass and isn’t slippery like the glossy black Pixel 4. Perhaps this is part of the reason I liked the Pixel 4a more than my Pixel 4 — it just feels nicer to hold. I’m sure the orange or white Pixel 4 would feel more premium, however.

The other benefit of the polycarbonate back panel is weight. While heavier phones tend to seem more premium and well-built, I appreciate the lightness of the 4a. I find it makes holding the phone more comfortable, especially when watching a video or trying to use it with one hand.

Making the most of the hole

The Pixel 4a’s size is also perfect. It’s slightly shorter than the Pixel 4 and Pixel 3, but has a larger display than both. Some people really like giant phones, but I’d rather have something that fits well in my hand. Plus, with the trend towards low-bezel screens, the Pixel 4a still offers a nearly 6-inch display without being physically large.

In fact, the display on the Pixel 4a as a whole is excellent. It comes in at a Full HD+ (FHD+) resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and 443ppi. Some prefer to have higher-res displays, but I’ve always found no tangible benefit for higher resolutions after a certain point. At this size of screen, it can be really difficult to see individual pixels, making higher resolutions less meaningful. For perspective, the Pixel 4a has almost the same resolution as my 25-inch ultrawide desktop monitor.

When I reviewed the Samsung Galaxy S20 earlier this year, I had to choose between using the full resolution of the screen at 60Hz or rendering at a lower resolution for a 120Hz refresh rate. I couldn’t tell the difference between the resolutions, but I certainly felt a difference between the refresh rates.

With the Pixel 4a, it’s much the same. The display looks great to me. It’s plenty sharp, and the colours look great. My only real complaint is that the screen has a 60Hz refresh rate. However, at the Pixel 4a’s price, I can forgive that. For most people who haven’t used a higher refresh rate screen, going from a 60Hz display to the Pixel 4a’s 60Hz screen won’t matter. If your current phone has a high-refresh-rate screen, you’ll feel the difference.

The main benefit of high refresh rate screens is that it feels smoother and more responsive to touch input. It’s something that is easier to experience by trying a high refresh rate display yourself.

I think it’s also worth pointing out that Google created several excellent, fun wallpapers for the 4a that specifically make use of the camera cutout. For example, one wallpaper has several dogs playing with black balls, one of which is the camera hole. In another wallpaper, the camera cutout is the hole of a basketball net. These creative wallpapers look great.

Handles day-to-day operations like a champ…

Despite the lower-end, mid-range Snapdragon 730 chipset, the Pixel 4a performed quite well. Aside from the odd janky, stuttery animation — something I encounter in almost every Android phone I use — the 4a handled everything I threw at it as well as last year’s Pixel 4.

That includes browsing social media like Twitter and Reddit, watching YouTube videos, using chat apps and more. Plus, with the 6GB of RAM, I rarely encountered closed apps that needed a restart.

I’m not much of a mobile gamer, however in my testing, the Pixel 4a didn’t have any difficulties and performed well. That said, if gaming is a priority on your phone, you will want to invest in higher-end hardware.

Ultimately, I think the highest praise I can heap on the Pixel 4a is that performance-wise, it feels just as snappy and fast as the Pixel 4, sans 90Hz display.

I also ran some benchmarks to compare, although there are a few caveats here. For one, benchmarks often don’t tell the whole story. How a phone feels in day-to-day use can differ significantly from the number assigned by a benchmark. That said, benchmarks can give people an idea of what performance is like.

The other caveat is that, at the time of writing, the Play Store listed Geekbench as incompatible with the Pixel 4a, so we chose to run Antutu instead. We compared the Pixel 3, 4 and 4a as well as the LG Velvet and OnePlus 8 Pro to capture a range of hardware. Plus, with the Pixel 5 rumoured to use the Snapdragon 765, we thought including a phone with that chip — the Velvet — was an important consideration.

Benchmarks from left to right: Pixel 4a, Pixel 4, Pixel 3, LG Velvet, OnePlus 8 Pro

Unsurprisingly, the benchmarks show that the 4a performs much worse than both the Pixel 3 and Pixel 4. The biggest area of weakness for the 4a was the GPU, which shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. The mid-range Qualcomm chips often suffer in terms of GPU performance. On the CPU end, the 4a stayed close to the 3, but both scored significantly under the Pixel 4. As for memory, all three scored relatively close together, but again the Pixel 4a was lowest.

One interesting tidbit of information from the Antutu benchmark is that the Pixel 4a saw lower battery drain and cooler temperatures throughout the benchmark. It’s worth noting that both the Pixel 3 and 4 I tested were running the latest Android 11 Beta, and while I doubt that would have a significant impact on the score, it’s worth considering. Once the Android 11 Beta becomes available for the 4a, I’d like to rerun the benchmark and see what, if any, improvement that brings.

Compared to the OnePlus 8 Pro with the Snapdragon 865, none of the phones match up. That comes as no surprise — I expect Qualcomm’s latest and greatest to be better than everything else on offer. However, the LG Velvet benchmark with the Snapdragon 765 is more interesting. It performed better than the Pixel 4a’s 730 chipset in every metric, but there wasn’t as much of a delta as I expected. It will be interesting to see if a Pixel device sporting the 765 performs similarly, or if Google’s optimization will give it more of a boost over the 4a.

… and lasts all day too

One area where the Pixel 4a consistently impressed me was battery life. At first, I didn’t expect the 3,140mAh cell in the 4a to perform that well, but the extra 340mAh compared to the Pixel 4 helped a lot — I’m sure the 60Hz display was also a factor here.

On average, the Pixel 4a made it almost through the entire day and I rarely had to top up before going to bed. I, unfortunately, couldn’t say the same for the Pixel 4, which I almost always have to charge twice per day.

The Pixel 4a doesn’t have the best battery life, however. I’d love to see a phone that truly lasts me two days on a charge, but I’m happy to take a Pixel that gets me through a day most of the time.

For the moments when you do need some extra charge, the Pixel 4a does support 18W fast charging. Unfortunately, Google once again skipped wireless charging in the 4a. It’s not a significant issue, especially considering the phone’s price, but I do appreciate the convenience of wireless charging and certainly missed it while testing the 4a.

Pixel 4 camera without the zoom

Finally, the Pixel 4a camera is a tremendous offering from Google. In my experience, few phones in this price range offer a camera as good as this.

Google took the primary Pixel 4 camera and put it in the affordable 4a. From a hardware perspective, the Pixel phones arguably never have the most impressive specs. But with Google’s software magic, they consistently take excellent pictures.

In my testing with the 4a, it nailed almost every shot. The two most significant differences between the 4a and the Pixel 4 camera are that the 4 tends towards warmer, yellower tones and has much better zoom thanks to the telephoto lens.

The former isn’t a huge deal, depending on your taste, and is really only noticeable in some side-by-side photos. The latter is mostly a factor of hardware differences — the Pixel 4 has a second telephoto camera.

That also means most of the Pixel 4 camera software goodies make a return on the Pixel 4a. Portrait mode, for example, returns and is just as good as ever. Night Sight also comes back and is quite capable — it even includes the astrophotography mode from the Pixel 4. The 4a supports 4K video recording as well.

Likewise, the front-facing camera on the 4a is very similar, although there are a few small hardware differences. Namely, the 4a has a slightly smaller pixel size and a narrower field of view, but overall, both 8-megapixel selfie shooters do excellent work.

Missing a few ‘flagship’ features

I think it’s important to consider some of the things the Pixel 4a lacks as well. As impressed as I am with the 4a, it doesn’t have some arguably ‘core’ Google Pixel features.

First off, the Pixel 4a doesn’t have Google’s ‘Active Edge’ functionality. Present on Pixels since the Pixel 2, Active Edge lets users squeeze the phone to activate Google Assistant. However, the loss of Active Edge isn’t as drastic as you might think. When I first noticed the feature wasn’t there, I was quite disappointed. But it didn’t take me long to realize I don’t use Active Edge that often anyway. And with the new Android gesture navigation system, Assistant is never more than a swipe away.

The Pixel 4a also lacks the Pixel 4’s Soli sensor and face unlock, which I mentioned up top. Soli I don’t particularly miss. The coolest part about that for me was always that the Pixel 4 would ‘react’ to my hand when I reached for it. I rarely used the Soli gestures to control my phone.

On the other hand, I miss face unlock more. It’s much more convenient to pick up the phone and have it unlock automatically. That said, the Pixel 4a fingerprint sensor is fast and the phone unlocks very quickly. I also welcome the sensor when wearing a mask. Google’s decision to only offer face unlock on the Pixel 4 seemed shortsighted to me, and that sentiment has only grown throughout the pandemic.

However, I don’t think any of these missing features are explicitly bad. While I may be disappointed by some missing things, the Pixel 4a also reminded me that some of these flagship features are superfluous. Cutting back on the extra bloat can elevate other parts of the experience.

The mid-range competition is heating up

Overall, the Pixel 4a is an excellent handset. If I were going to buy a phone today, I would very likely purchase the 4a. It’s priced well, performs well for everything that I do, has the latest and greatest Pixel software features and an incredibly capable camera that rivals many flagships out there.

It’s also worth considering that the Pixel 4a includes Google’s three-year software update commitment, so you can comfortably use the 4a for the next few years without worry.

Compared to most other mid-range Android phones available, I think the Pixel 4a is the clear choice. The OnePlus Nord isn’t available in Canada, Samsung’s Galaxy A71 offers better hardware but costs $120 more. Motorola has some good mid-range options, but most don’t match the Pixel 4a’s camera.

The post Pixel 4a Review: Forgoing flagship features for a great, affordable phone appeared first on MobileSyrup.